Case Studies: Impacts of RTI Act 2005 (India) and FOIA 1966 (USA)
Introduction
The Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, in India and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 1966, in the USA have profoundly shaped transparency and accountability in governance. This page presents key case studies highlighting their impacts—successes in exposing corruption and empowering citizens, as well as challenges like backlogs and risks to requesters. These examples underscore how information laws drive democratic progress while facing implementation hurdles. Data is current as of October 2025.
RTI Act 2005: Case Studies from India
Case Study 1: The 2G Spectrum Scam (2010) – Uncovering Massive Corruption
Description: RTI activist Subhash Chandra Agarwal filed requests seeking details on the allocation of 2G spectrum licenses by the Department of Telecommunications. The responses revealed irregularities in the first-come-first-served policy, leading to investigations.
Case Study 2: Commonwealth Games Scam (2010) – Mismanagement in Public Projects
Description: Multiple RTI queries by journalists and activists targeted the Organizing Committee, revealing inflated contracts and poor procurement practices for the Delhi Commonwealth Games.
Case Study 3: Adarsh Housing Society Scam (2010) – Abuse of Power
Description: RTI requests exposed illegal allotments of flats in a Mumbai building meant for Kargil war widows to politicians and bureaucrats.
Case Study 4: COVID-19 Response Failures (2020-2021) – Public Health Accountability
Description: Activists filed RTIs on ventilator procurement and vaccine distribution, revealing shortages and mismanagement during the pandemic.
FOIA 1966: Case Studies from the USA
Case Study 1: Watergate Scandal (1972-1974) – Catalyzing FOIA Amendments
Description: Journalists used FOIA to access White House tapes and documents, revealing Nixon's involvement in the break-in cover-up.
Case Study 2: Pentagon Papers (1971) – Freedom of Press and Government Secrets
Description: FOIA requests and leaks exposed classified documents on Vietnam War deceptions, published by The New York Times.
Case Study 3: EPIC v. DHS (2010s) – Privacy Impact Assessments
Description: Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) used FOIA to obtain DHS records on surveillance programs, revealing inadequate privacy reviews.
Case Study 4: Associated Press on Secret Email Accounts (2013) – Government Evasion
Description: AP's FOIA requests uncovered federal agencies using unlisted emails to avoid transparency in operations.
Comparative Insights and Conclusion
Both RTI and FOIA have transformative impacts: RTI excels in exposing local corruption (e.g., 2G scam) with quick timelines but faces violence against users (100+ deaths). FOIA drives systemic reforms (e.g., Watergate) via judicial enforcement but struggles with backlogs (20-year delays). Together, they empower citizens but require stronger protections and resources. As of 2025, with RTI's 20th anniversary approaching, reforms like reducing pendency (4 lakh appeals) and FOIA's digital enhancements could amplify their global influence.
Published on October 07, 2025. Sources: Vikaspedia, Wikipedia, Drishti IAS, EPIC, Knight Open Government Survey.